Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nao Hibino vs Malak El Allami Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hibino vs Allami analysis and find out who is favored!
Nao Hibino vs Malak El Allami Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Hibino 0 - 0 Allami
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hibino has won 44.77% of points on their second serve, while Allami has won 46.64%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hibino, in recent form, has won 54.8% of their opponent's second serve points, while Allami has won 50.75%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.16% and 39.38% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hibino has saved 53.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Allami has saved 54.84% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hibino has won 50% of matches played (W/L 30/ 30), with Allami winning 46.67% (W/L 7/ 8) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hibino has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 15/ 11), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 43/ 54). Allami has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 10/ 9), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 27% (W/L 4/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Hibino has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 52.38% of matches (W/L 11/ 10), where as Allami has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 7/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hibino has played against opponents with an average rank of 195.52 while Allami has played against players with an average rank of 97.13.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hibino has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Allami has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hibino has converted 45.95% of breakpoint opportunities, and Allami has converted 50.91% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
96
Rank
56
High
29
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
17
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
55% (368-298)
Career Total W/L
41% (14-20)
47% (14-16)
YTD W/L
60% (3-2)
$1,225,315
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nao Hibino | Malak El Allami |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 47% (14/16) | 60% (3/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 46% (35/41) | 46% (6/7) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (337/346) | 50% (58/57) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 55% (12/10) | 75% (3/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/6) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.15 | 0.32 |
| Aces Total | 50 | 18 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 89 | 14 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:8 | 2:11:16 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 163.5 | 162.8 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (1488/2234) | 53% (201/381) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (919/1488) | 61% (123/201) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (334/746) | 48% (86/180) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (119/259) | 58% (22/38) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (970/2248) | 45% (155/348) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 62% (8/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 38% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (14/30) | 60% (3/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 56% (9/16) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 69% (13/9) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 31% (13/4) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (17/5) | 50% (4/2) |
Nao Hibino Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Bernarda Pera
Player
Nao Hibino
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Nao Hibino
66%
(
61 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
64 of
100)
1
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
5
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
47%
(
44 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
50 of
100)
99
Total Points Won
94
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristina Mladenovic
Player
Nao Hibino
66%
(
77 of
117)
1st Serve %
57%
(
56 of
99)
0
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
9
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
41%
(
48 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
99)
116
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guiomar Zuleta De Reales
Player
Nao Hibino
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Nao Hibino
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
6
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Nao Hibino
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 3 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Yulia Putintseva
74%
(
77 of
104)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
99)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Anna Danilina
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
27 of
39)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Nao Hibino
65%
(
84 of
130)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
98)
6
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
46 of
70)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
46%
(
60 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
112
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Erika Andreeva
Player
Nao Hibino
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
95
Total Points Won
97
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Malak El Allami Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Lucia Bronzetti
Player
Malak El Allami
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
11 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-7(4) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Tessa Johanna Brockmann
Player
Malak El Allami
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
87)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(5) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Malak El Allami
Player
Milana Zhabrailova
41%
(
39 of
94)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
80)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
56%
(
31 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
40 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
86
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Malak El Allami
Player
Tian Jialin
44%
(
31 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
79
Total Points Won
61
|
3-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Malak El Allami
Player
Michika Ozeki
55%
(
47 of
85)
1st Serve %
48%
(
35 of
73)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
38 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
87
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Milana Zhabrailova
Player
Malak El Allami
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Malak El Allami
Player
Yanan Hou
55%
(
63 of
115)
1st Serve %
74%
(
86 of
116)
5
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
6
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
53 of
86)
44%
(
23 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
49 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
53 of
116)
119
Total Points Won
112
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz
Player
Malak El Allami
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
81)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
28 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
46 of
81)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Malak El Allami
Player
Lara Pfeifer
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve %
83%
(
5 of
6)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
41%
(
7 of
17)
1st Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
50%
(
12 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
16
Total Points Won
14
|
2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Hibino Vs Allami Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Malak El Allami
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
